Skip to main content

The Hidden Costs Behind “100% Royalties” Claims


Many music distributors proudly advertise slogans like “Keep 100% of your royalties” - a phrase that’s instantly attractive to independent artists looking to earn every rupee or dollar they deserve. But behind this appealing promise lies a complicated web of costs, tricks, and in some cases, outright manipulation. The truth? That “100%” often applies only on the surface. Dig deeper, and you’ll find loopholes, hidden fees, and something even more worrying: the royalty report you see as an artist may not even be the full truth.


Gross vs. Net: The Misleading Math Behind “100% Royalties”

At first glance, “100% royalties” implies you’ll keep all the money from your streams - no cuts, no middlemen. But this usually refers only to gross revenue: the total amount a streaming platform like Spotify or Apple Music pays before any fees are deducted. What really matters is net income: how much you get after all costs.

For example, LANDR offers a Basic plan at €18.99/year claiming artists keep 100% of royalties. But if you stop paying that subscription, they begin taking a 15% cut. DistroKid charges $19.99/year for unlimited uploads and says you keep 100% - but that $20 is how they profit. Even TuneCore, once commission-based, now offers a “100% royalties” plan - but it comes with annual per-release or per-artist fees.

In every case, you're still paying. Whether upfront or in disguise, the money is leaving your pocket.


The Ugly Possibility: Are Revenue Reports Being Manipulated?

Beyond the fees and plans lies a darker possibility many artists never consider: the revenue reports you receive from your distributor may not be the complete truth.

Most independent artists never get to see the original reports from DSPs (Digital Streaming Platforms) like Spotify, Apple Music, or YouTube. Distributors act as the middlemen - and they control what data reaches you. This means they could underreport your earnings, take hidden backend commissions, or apply unofficial cuts without ever disclosing them. You see a clean, 100% payout on a possibly doctored dashboard - but how would you know if it’s accurate?

This is not just a conspiracy theory. Several artists across forums have shared inconsistencies between what DSPs report (when they get direct insight via backend tools) and what distributors show. Since most platforms don’t provide public APIs or user-facing DSP receipts, the room for manipulation is large. It’s a loophole that some distributors exploit to cut royalties behind the scenes - while still claiming transparency.


Subscription & Pay-Per-Release Fees: You’re Still Paying

Let’s say you earn ₹3,000 from streams in a year and your distributor charges ₹1,499 annually for access. That’s 50% of your revenue gone, even if your dashboard shows “100% royalties.” The math doesn’t lie: if you're paying out of pocket just to stay listed, you're not keeping 100% of anything.

Even seemingly “cheap” services like DistroKid or RouteNote take their pound of flesh. With RouteNote’s free tier, you keep 85%, not 100% - unless you upgrade. Others charge for each release, like CD Baby or TuneCore, reducing your earnings per song.

And that’s assuming they don’t hide backend deductions in the name of internal costs or “processing.”


Hidden Fees & Paywalled Features: The Real Cost of “Free”

Many services lure you in with zero commissions, only to nickel-and-dime you later:

  • Withdrawal fees

  • Currency conversion costs (often 3-5%)

  • High payout thresholds (like $50 minimum before you can cash out)

  • Locked features like Content ID, split payments, or metadata control

Unchained, for instance, claims 100% royalties - but takes 15% of splits unless you pay extra. FreshTunes is “free,” but diverts 20% of royalties owed to songwriters. On RouteNote’s free plan, they take 15% of all royalties.

Every small charge adds up. And while you believe you’re keeping “everything,” the system is quietly draining your income.


Case Study: Same Streams, Different Outcomes

Let’s say your songs earn $400 from Spotify and YouTube. You choose between four distributors:

  • Distributor A: Flat ₹49 fee, 90% royalties = ~$364

  • Distributor B: 100% royalties, $20 yearly = ~$342

  • Distributor C: Pay-per-release = ~$333

  • Distributor D: Hidden fees and commissions = ~$327

Each claims “100% royalties,” but your actual income can vary by over ₹3,000 per year.

Now imagine if your distributor is also cutting backend royalties and showing you edited reports - your real earnings could be even lower, and you’d never know.


The Illusion of “Zero Commission”: A Psychological Trap

The phrase “keep it all” is powerful. Marketers know indie musicians are emotionally and financially vulnerable - so a phrase like “100% of your royalties” creates instant trust. But slogans don’t pay rent.

Experts warn that fixating on the commission rate blinds artists to the real economics: lower service quality, less support, and potentially manipulated reports. You might be sacrificing control, trust, and clarity - all for a feel-good number that may not reflect reality.

Always ask:
“100% of what? After what costs? And based on which data?”


Why Transparency Matters: The DireNote Media Approach

The safest way around these gimmicks is to use a distributor with clear, upfront pricing. For example, DireNote Media explicitly brands itself as transparent and artist‑friendly. Its website emphasizes avoiding hidden charges and complicated contracts. DireNote’s plans clearly list the fee and the exact royalty split. For instance, their “Carbon Plan” is a one‑time ₹49 (pay-per-release) fee for 90% of streaming royalties (song stays live 5 years), while “Carbon Plus” is ₹149 for 95% (lifetime). There are no mysterious add‑ons – you know in advance that after paying ₹49 you will keep 90% of whatever your streams earn. This clarity lets artists calculate net income easily. In short, rather than chasing 100% slogans, look for a service (like DireNote Media) that lays out every cost from the start.


Final Takeaway: Don’t Fall for “100%” Without Doing the Math

If a distributor only offers “100% royalties” while you’re paying them, then it’s not really free, and it may not even be honest. Every rupee spent on hidden fees, ambiguous reports, or locked features eats into your actual income.

In an industry where transparency is rare and data manipulation is real, choose partners who earn your trust - not just your streams. Pick a distributor that doesn’t just show flashy percentages, but gives you full visibility into what matters: your real net earnings.


DireNote Media stands for ethical distribution, clear reporting, and empowering artists with the truth.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Music Distributors Matter for Independent Artists

You’ve poured your heart into a new song and the next step is sharing it with the world. But how do you actually get that song onto Spotify, Apple Music and everywhere else? This is where a music distributor comes in. A good distributor acts as your bridge to streaming platforms, ensuring your release goes live everywhere on the release date and that all the details are correct. In fact, industry experts note that most major streaming services don’t even allow artists to upload directly – Spotify famously shut down its direct-upload beta, saying “music distribution is best handled by partners”. Even Apple will suggest using a distributor to make sure your song’s metadata (title, credits, cover art, etc.) “fits the platform’s requirements”. In short, a distributor manages the technical stuff so you can focus on your music. Getting Your Music on Streaming Platforms Once your track is ready, a distributor will deliver it to all major (and minor) platforms for you. You could upload to ...

Is Your Spotify Subscription Funding War?

Spotify’s CEO Daniel Ek recently sparked an uproar by having his private fund, Prima Materia, lead a €600 million investment in Helsing – a German defense-tech startup specializing in AI for warfare. Helsing, now valued at roughly €12 billion, builds software and autonomous hardware (drones, aircraft, naval vehicles) for military use. In the wake of this deal, indie rock band Deerhoof announced it will pull its entire catalog from Spotify. In their statement they wrote, “We don’t want our music killing people. We don’t want our success being tied to AI battle tech.” . This move highlights deep ethical questions about streaming platforms. In this article, we’ll unpack Spotify’s Helsing investment, Deerhoof’s history and values, past Spotify controversies (artist pay and content disputes), and the fallout for artists, fans, and the company. Spotify’s Investment in Helsing Last month, reports revealed that Ek’s fund Prima Materia led a €600 million funding round in Helsing. Helsing...